Legal Opinion

Paulk v. STATE MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1952No. 33890PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorrill, J.

In an action predicated upon a “Conditional Receipt” and an application for insurance, both instruments provided that, if the first premium is paid at the time of making the application and the company is satisfied that the applicant is, according to the rules and standards of the company, an acceptable risk for the insurance applied for, the insurance shall be effective as of the date of the application or of the medical examination, whichever is the later. It appears that the applicant paid the first premium at the time of the application, but had not taken the examination when he died…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maddox v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Fort Valley Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Hill v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Starkes v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. LammeNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sasser v. Coastal States Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Damm v. National Insurance Company of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Union Life Ins. Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Etheridge v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API