Legal Opinion

Etheridge v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 3, 1966No. 42037PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

We hold that the application and receipt in this case constituted a contract which provided temporary life insurance in accordance with the terms of the policy applied for unless the applicant was not an insurable risk on the date of application and that the conditional coverage was effective until the company acted on the application or until the contract became ineffective by expiration of time. The condition stated in the receipt is construed to be a condition subsequent rather than a condition precedent. Since the condition is a condition subsequent, the insurance…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maddox v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Paulk v. STATE MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Hill v. Life & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  5. Kammerer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  2. Damm v. National Insurance Company of AmericaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Atkinson v. American Agency Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Lemieux v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Bedgood v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API