Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Frank Diaz
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1993No. 92-2158PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Charles Frank Diaz was sentenced to three years of probation after pleading guilty to uttering counterfeit obligations in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472 (1982). Mr. Diaz subsequently violated the conditions of his probation by using a controlled substance. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3565(a) (1988), the district court revoked Mr. Diaz’ probation and sentenced him to a twelve month term of imprisonment, one-third of his original sentence of probation. Rec., vol. I, doc. 16. Mr. Diaz argues on appeal that the district court erred in using his sentence of probation as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bifulco v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Michael L. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Behrooz K. BehnezhadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Cheryl GordonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jose Corpuz, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. GrandersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Haynes v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. OberleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.