Legal Opinion

Muenchenbach v. Preble Cty.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2001No. 1999-1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 141.] MUENCHENBACH ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO, ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Muenchenbach v. Preble Cty.,

2001-Ohio-244.] Political subdivision tort liability—For purposes of R.C. 2744.02(B)(1), a “use standard” is an appropriate test for determining whether a vehicle is excepted from the definition in R.C. 4511.01(B) of “motor vehicle” on the basis that it constitutes “other equipment used in construction work and not designed for or employed in general highway transportation.” (No. 99-1930—Submitted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Meeks v. PapadopulosOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Symmes Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. SmythOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Bryant v. Dayton Casket Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Wayne Cty. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. ForkOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Pfautz v. Dept. of Job Family Servs., 9-06-62 (12-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. ForkOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State ex rel. Jones v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API