Legal Opinion

Cox v. Alabama State Bar

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided June 1, 2005No. 2:04-CV-612-FPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FULLER, Chief Judge.

This case arises out of the Alabama State Bar’s refusal to allow Eric Cox (“Cox”) double time to take the Alabama bar examination as an accommodation of his disabilities of Attention Deficit Disorder (“ADD”) and Dyslexia. Cox brings claims against the Alabama State Bar (“Alabama Bar”) for violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12117. 1 (Compl. 4.) This cause is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment: Alabama State Bar’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 31) and Eric Cox’s Motion for Summary…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API