Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Harger

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 18, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 638Published

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Judge.

The primary question presented to the Court is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a judgment in favor of a seller against the claimed buyer where the claim for relief arises out of a writing relating to three State leases one of which was transferred prior to the execution of the writing. The following persons and organizations should be borne in mind in connection with this opinion; Harger; Chapman; Mrs. Chapman; Divelbess; Desert Farms, LTD, a limited partnership; Yuma Desert Farms, a limited partnership; and Dateland Desert Farms, a limited partnership. Additional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. City of Tucson v. WondergemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. United Farmers' City Market, Inc. v. DonofrioArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Chadwick v. WinnArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Wilhorn Builders, Inc. v. Cortaro Management Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API