Legal Opinion

Currie v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1923No. 3426PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

The court refused, although duly requested in writing, to charge the jury as follows: (1) “ If you find from the evidence that the mind of the defendant at the time of the killing was diseased, that by reason of such mental disease his will power was impaired, that by reason of such impairment, so caused, he did not have sufficient will power to refrain from committing the act, and that the act was the product of such mental disease, he was not responsible for the act and it would be your duty to acquit the defendant. To be held criminally responsible, a man must have reason enough to be able…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brisbin v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Carr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. State v. TiemanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Moncrief v. ElyNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  5. Simmons v. BullSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Currie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Murray v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  5. Landers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API