Legal Opinion

LOL Finance Co. v. Easy Money Catfish Co.

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided February 2, 2012No. Civil Action No. 4:09cv23-MSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MICHAEL P. MILLS, Chief Judge.

This cause comes before the court on the renewed motions of defendants Easy *1020Money Catfish Company, Robert N. Pearson, Georgia S. Pearson, Kevin L. Pearson, Patricia M. Pearson, and Mitchell Pearson (collectively “Defendants”), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, for summary judgment. Plaintiff LOL Finance Co. (“LOL”) has responded in opposition to the motions, and the court, having considered the memoranda and submissions of the parties, concludes that the motions are well taken and should be granted.

This is a breach of contract case in which plaintiff seeks to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Whitestone Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Burnham Mortgage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. Haygood v. First Nat. Bank of New AlbanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank National Ass'n ex rel. TBW Mortgage-Backed Trust Series 2006-5 v. State Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014
  2. Najah v. Scottsdale Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API