Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Simmers v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 29, 1917No. Nos. 20,366 — (193)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Upon the relation of A. M. Simmers and William Campbell, co-partners as Simmers & Campbell, the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for Stearns county and the Honorable John A. Roeser, one of the judges thereof, to review proceedings in that 'court under the Workmen’s Compensation Act brought by Ida. Larson against relators, as employers, and the Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corporation, as insurer.

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Defendants, Simmers & Campbell, are engaged in the business of quarrying, cutting and preparing granite stone for market at St. Cloud in this state. Defendant insurance company is engaged in writing indemnifying policies to employers for liability under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and during the times in question was the insurer of the employers, Simmers & Campbell.

January 26, 1916, Eric Larson, now deceased, was in the employ of Simmers & Campbell, at $13.50 per week, assisting in cutting and *319preparing granite stone for market, and both he and his employers were subject to the provisions…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Rinker v. District Court of Pennington CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Stenberg v. Raymond Co-Operative CreamerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Krenz v. Krenz Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Clements Auto Company v. The Service Bureau CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API