Jones v. Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. H. R. G-ibson, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.
The fire policy issued by the defendant company on lumber owned by the complainants, contained in its written part a warranty that a' continuous clear space of 150 feet should be maintained between the lumber insured and the saw-mill, dry-kiln, or any wood-working or manufacturing establishment, and that said space should not be used for the handling or piling of lumber *605thereon. This warranty was untrue when made and untrue when the insured property was burned by fire communicated from a saw-mill within the space provided for. The contract of insurance is a conditional one. If no risk…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Smithart v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- Taylor v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Georgia Home Ins. Co. v. RosenfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- United States Life Ins. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.