Legal Opinion

Jennie Darrow v. Ingenesis Inc.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided July 2, 2020No. 5:20-cv-00530Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION JENNIE DARROW, § Plaintiff, § § SA-20-CV-00530-XR v. § § INGENESIS INC., DR. VERONICA § MUZQUIZ EDWARDS, § Defendants. § ORDER On this date, the Court considered Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 42), Plaintiff’s Response (ECF No. 45), and Defendants’ Reply (ECF No. 46). The Court also considered the oral arguments of the parties made in open court on June 30, 2020. After careful consideration, the Court will GRANT Defendants’ motion. BACKGROUND I. Procedural Background This…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API