Legal Opinion

Shasta Lumber Co. v. McCoy

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 1927No. Docket No. 3293PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

In an action prosecuted by the Chicago Lumber Company against Leal & Sons Lumber Company, a writ of attachment was duly issued and placed in the hands of the defendant, who, pursuant to the authority thereof, seized certain lumber claimed by and in the possession of the plaintiff herein. Judgment in that action was rendered in favor of the plaintiff therein and the defendant herein sold the lumber to satisfy the judgment. This action was thereafter commenced to recover the value of the lumber so sold. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed.

There is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cooney, Eckstein & Co. v. SweatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Swift Co. v. . TempelosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Phillips v. ByersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Connecticut Steam Brown Stone Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Western Truck LineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Story v. ChristinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Miller v. KeeganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Aggregates Associated, Inc. v. PackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Security Trust Co. v. SilvermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API