Legal Opinion · Dissent

Trimble v. Trimble

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1966No. 36194Published

1Dissent

Murphy, District

Judge, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion herein, and in that connection I submit the following observations.

The question of the constitutionality of the applicable statutes, particularly sections 42-318 and 42-321, R. R. S. 1943, to the extent they may function as limitations upon the broad chancery powers of the district courts (Article V, section 9, Constitution of Nebraska) is a question which suggests itself, but was neither presented nor determined in the trial court, and which has not been presented here. In her brief, plaintiff relies upon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prosser v. ProsserNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Madison County v. CrippenNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. De Lair v. De LairNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Read v. City of ScottsbluffNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ebberson v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 64 OF CEDAR COUNTYNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API