Legal Opinion

Read v. City of Scottsbluff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1965No. 35989PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.

On August 26, 1963, the City of Seottsbluff passed an ordinance annexing certain property, including that of the plaintiffs, to the City of Seottsbluff. The ordinance was enacted under the provisions of L.B. 338, 1963 Legislative Session, and the plaintiffs perfected their appeal to the district court pursuant to section 4 of that act (§ 16-110, R. S. Supp., 1963). The district court found generally for the city and dismissed the plaintiffs’ appeal.

The first two assignments of error rest on the contention that L.B. 338 is unconstitutional because it violates due process of law with respect to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Roanoke v. ElliottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
  2. ALUMNI CONTROL BD., ALPHA PSI CHAP. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Breckenbridge v. County School BoardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Shields v. City of KearneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pony Lake School District 30 v. State Committee for Reorganization of School DistrictsNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Cox Nebraska Telecom, L.L.C. v. Qwest Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Zoiman v. LandsmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Marting v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Ulbrick v. City of Nebraska CityNebraska Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API