Legal Opinion

Hardisty v. Moore

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 18, 2014No. Case No. 11cv1591 AJB (BLM)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Defendants Harold Maxine Moore (“Hal Moore”), Elaine K. Moore, aka Melanie K. Moore (“Melanie Moore”), State Insulation, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (“State Insulation — Arizona”), State Insulation, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“State Insulation — Nevada”) (collectively, “State Insulation”), the 1998 Harold M. Moore Revocable Trust (“the Trust”), and Mark Peluso’s (“Peluso”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hodgson v. RoperDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. Hollow Horn v. Firstcomp Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2021
  3. IQL Riggig, LLC v. Kingsbridge TechnologiesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. In re: Google Location History LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API