Legal Opinion

Perry v. Connor

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1983No. 82AP-938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, J.

Plaintiff-appellant, Seiburn Perry, fractured his arm on March 7, 1978, while working for Landr mark, Inc. His workers’ compensation claim was allowed for his arm condition. Thereafter, Perry’s motion to allow a low back condition was denied by the Industrial Commission. He appealed to the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County. After trial to a jury, judgment was entered for defendant.

Plaintiff has appealed, asserting the following assignments of error:

“1. The verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence.
“2. The trial court erred in refusing to charge the cost of plaintiff’s…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moore v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State ex rel. Williams v. ColasurdOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Breidenbach v. ConradOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Clark v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Ramirez v. Toledo Stamping & Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API