Legal Opinion

State v. Hicks

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 23, 1992PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BYERS, Presiding Judge.

Each of the appellants was convicted of facilitating a Class A felony (murder in the first degree) and of possessing intoxicants in a county institution. Hicks and Womac were also found guilty of introduction of an intoxicant into the county jail.

Hicks and Womac were each sentenced to serve twenty-five years on the offense of criminal facilitation and six years on each of the counts involving intoxicants in the county jail. They were ordered to pay fines of fifty thousand dollars on the facili*35tation charges. For possession of intoxicants, the jury fixed fines of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. BurtonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. Luttrell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. MellonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. StocktonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  2. State v. TrustyTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Houston v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. A.G.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Houston v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API