Legal Opinion

State v. Runge

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 27, 1989No. 28, September Term, 1989PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

In this case we must decide the extent to which Maryland Code (1957, 1985 Repl.Vol., 1989 Cum. Supp.), Article 88A, § 6, subsection (b), requires disclosure of a county department of social services’ files to a criminal defendant charged with child abuse. 1 We shall hold that this subsection, standing alone, does not entitle a defendant to any disclosure of those files.

I

The grand jury for Cecil County indicted respondent, William Frederick Runge (Runge), on three counts of sexual child abuse. A jury sitting in the circuit court for that county convicted Runge on all three…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Zaal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API