Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 30, 1980No. 14PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

This equity action was initiated by Appellant to secure an accounting from the individual Defendants-Appellees on the basis of an alleged breach by Appellees of their fiduciary duties as Directors of Hill Equipment Company (hereinafter referred to as “Hill Co.”). Further, the Appellee sought to secure a declaration that certain assets acquired by Hillcrest Oil Service Equipment Company (hereinafter referred to as “Hillcrest Co.”) from the Hill Co. should be held in trust for the benefit of Appellants.

Plaintiff-Appellant Eleanor R. Hill and Defendant-Ap-pellee Hubert H. Hill…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Lutherland, Inc. v. DahlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. MonacoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Porter v. HealySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Bird Coal & Iron Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aqua-Culture Technologies, Ltd. v. HollyMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lussier v. Mau-Van Development, Inc. IHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Stanger v. Athos Steel Aluminum, Inc. (In Re Athos Steel & Aluminum, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. CST, INC. v. MarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Fitzpatrick v. ShaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API