Legal Opinion

Bagley v. Tyler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1891PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. R. H. Field, Judge. (1) The statute of Kansas is almost identical with article 8, section 6, of the constitution of 1865 of Missouri, creating double liability of stockholders. Our supreme court construed the statute penal in its nature. Krizer v. Woodson, 19 Mo. 327-330 ;’ Ochiltree v. Railroad, 54 Mo. 113. (2) Statutes penal in their nature will not be enforced in another state.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. R. H. Field, Judge. (1) The statute of Kansas is almost identical with article 8, section 6, of the constitution of 1865 of Missouri, creating double liability of stockholders. Our supreme court construed the statute penal in its nature. Krizer v. Woodson, 19 Mo. 327-330 ;’ Ochiltree v. Railroad, 54 Mo. 113. (2) Statutes penal in their nature will not be enforced in another state. Cook on Stock and Stockholders, sec. 218 ; Story on Conflict o'f Laws, sec. 621; Rorer on Inter-State Law, secs. 148-149 ; Ogden v. St. Joe, 90 Mo. 522. (3) Appellant…

1Opinion of the CourtGill, J.

In the year 1882 a corporation was organized under the laws of the state of Kansas, with its home office in Cherokee county, Kansas; said corporation was known by the name of the ‘ ‘ Cherokee Brilliant Coal & Mining Company, of Cherokee county, Kansas.' ’ In 1883, plaintiff Bagley became the owner of a number of shares *200of stock in the corporation, and for a time acted as the company’s bookkeeper. But in December, 1885, plaintiff sold the stock to some parties in Chicago, and the same was transferred on the books of the corporation. These purchasers, being elected to the offices of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Pullman v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Perry v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. McClaren v. FranciscusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howarth v. LombardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Guerney v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Hancock National Bank v. EllisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Ferguson v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hale v. HardonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API