Legal Opinion

State v. Schimmels

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1919No. 15017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Ferry county, Neal, J., entered February 21, 1918, upon a trial and conviction of grand larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant Schimmels was charged and convicted by the verdict of a jury in the superior court for Ferry county of the crime of grand larceny, *152committed by tbe stealing of a pair of bobsleds. He has appealed to tbis court.

Counsel for appellant, by appropriate motion made at tbe conclusion of tbe state’s evidence, challenged tbe sufficiency of tbe evidence to sustain a conviction, asking tbe court to so decide as a matter of law; and at tbe conclusion of all tbe evidence, requested tbe court to direct tbe jury to return a verdict of not guilty in bis favor. Tbe claimed error of tbe trial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Watts v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. BelcherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  4. Calloway v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Porter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. BoudreauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API