Legal Opinion

State v. Boudreau

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 6, 1940PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.

The respondent was charged with burglary and larceny. At the close of the State’s evidence a motion was made for a directed verdict of not guilty on the ground that there was no evidence in the case to warrant a conviction on either charge. This motion was granted and the case is here on exceptions by the State.

The material facts as disclosed by the evidence are as follows: The store of W. E. Brock, located in Troy, was broken into on the night of December 17, 1939, and merchandise and money was stolen. About two weeks later one Blanchard came to Sanville, a constable, and confessed to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Perkins v. Vermont Hydro-Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  3. Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. State v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1835
  5. Robinson v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  3. State v. BallouSupreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  4. State v. BrissonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  5. Commonwealth v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API