Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Decoto
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1920No. Civ. No. 3539PublishedCited by 13 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
BEASLY, J., pro tem.
On April 23, 1915, the plaintiff, Menzie Walsh, filed in the superior court of Alameda County an unverified complaint against Blue Taxicab Corporation as defendant. The Blue Taxicab Corporation was named as defendant in the title of the action, and in the body of the complaint the corporate character of the defendant was set out. By her complaint the plaintiff sought damages for certain personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by her on September 1, 1914, through the negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant on the streets of the city of Oakland. On…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nisbet v. Clio Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
- Thompson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Altpeter v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mirabito v. San Francisco Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Craig v. San Fernando Furniture Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hawkins v. Pacific Coast Building Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Smith v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Mayberry v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.