Legal Opinion

Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Johnston

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 19, 1918No. 9285PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Oourt, Sequoyah County; John H. Pitehford, Judge. Action by the Farmers’ National Bank against John E. Johnston. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

The Farmers’ National Bank commenced an action against John E; Johnston upon a postdated check drawn on the Sallisaw Bank & Trust Company in favor of Edwards & Co., and by them indorsed to the Farmers’ State Bank, which latter institution was converted into the Farmers’ National Bank. When the check was present-el, payment was refused and the check protested.

The answer of defendant contained a specific denial of the corporate existence of plaintiff, which was duly verified. At the trial, plaintiff proved by oral testimony the existence of plaintiff as a national bank and the conduct of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Bank of Bethel v. Pahquioque BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Chemical National Bank v. Hartford Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Way v. ButterworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  5. Yakima National Bank v. KnipeWashington Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGuire v. Bastain Blessing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API