Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Gleneagle Development Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1976No. Civ. 47739Published

1Opinion of the Court

62 Cal.App.3d 543 (1976)

133 Cal. Rptr. 212

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

GLENEAGLE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Docket No. 47739.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

September 27, 1976.

COUNSEL

Burt Pines, City Attorney, Charles W. Sullivan and Thomas B. Bonaventura, Assistant City Attorneys, and John C. Hamilton, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Kranitz, Sarrow, Imerman & Sacks, Bernard Sacks and Maurice H. Wallbert for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

KINGSLEY, Acting P.J.

Appellant, the City of Los Angeles,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Berri v. RogeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Black Bros. Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API