Legal Opinion

State v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2011No. MI070621; A142284PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

The state appeals from the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of the charge in this case of driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010, on the ground that defendant had successfully completed diversion. The state contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the case because defendant had failed to completely pay the filing fee associated with the diversion petition within the statutory one-year diversion period and she had failed to apply for an extension of the diversion period. As explained below, we conclude that the trial court erred, and we therefore remand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. KononenOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. State v. Vargas-GarciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. ZookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API