Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Davies

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 30, 1993No. 90-3278-DESPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SAFFELS, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (Doe. 10.) Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis on a complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. When plaintiff initiated this action, he was incarcerated at Lansing Correctional Facility (LCF) in Lansing, Kansas. Plaintiff alleges constitutional violations resulted in a prison disciplinary action based on plaintiffs positive urinalysis test result. Having reviewed the record, the court makes the following findings and order. 1

Summary judgment is appropriate where there…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API