Legal Opinion

Kronenthal v. Rosenthal

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by Blanche Kronenthal against Louis Rosenthal and others. On motion to settle and confirm the accounts of a receiver. Motion granted.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

When this application to settle and confirm the accounts of a receiver came on for argument, a reference was ordered in aid of the decision of the motion. The receiver, appointed in a foreclosure action, took possession of the property on April 3, 1912, and remained in possession until June 27th of the same year, when the plaintiff, who bought the property in, took possession. The receiver’s account shows that during that time he had extensive repairs and renovations made upon the property, chiefly in papering and painting and plumbing work, the cost of which, with his administration…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vilas v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Kent v. WestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Litho Fund Equities, Inc. v. Alley Spring Apartments Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Slack v. McAteeNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fine v. Clinton Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API