Legal Opinion
Milici v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 18, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Judge.
Joseph Milici (Claimant) petitions for review of an October 11, 2000 order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) to modify Claimant’s benefits as of March 10, 1997, based on Claimant’s bad faith rejection of an existing and available job offered by Employer. 1 We affirm.
Claimant was employed by the City of Philadelphia (Employer) as a firefighter when, on January 20, 1988, he became totally disabled as a result of coronary artery disease and obstructive lung disease from work-related stress and his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- St. Joe Container Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- ABF Freight Systems, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Farley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Maleski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002