Isley v. Aker Philadelphia Shipyard, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MCHUGH, J.
In this employment case, a worker slated for termination because of poor attendance asked that his employer retroactively reclassify two of his unexcused absences as protected leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), or the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), as supplemented by state law. The employer declined and proceeded to fire him. Discovery is now complete, and because there is ho evidence of discriminatory intent, and the plaintiff was not eligible for FMLA leave as a matter of law, summary judgment will be granted in favor of the employer.
I.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Katherine L. Taylor v. Phoenixville School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Macvaugh v. Cnty. of MontgomeryDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- ALISON RAY v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- ANSELMO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- BERARDINUCCI v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- CAMPO v. MID-ATLANTIC PACKAGING SPECIALTIES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.