Legal Opinion
Clausen Law Firm, PLLC v. National Academy of Continuing Legal Education
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 2, 2010No. Case 10-cv-01023-JPDPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(1)
JAMES P. DONOHUE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY CONCLUSION
On June 21, 2010, plaintiff Clausen Law Firm, PLLC (“Clausen”) filed a complaint on its behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated against defendant National Academy of Continuing Legal Education (“NACLE”), alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq., Washington Unsolicited Telefacsimile statute, RCW 80.36.540, and Washington Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86, et…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld (In re Rosenfeld)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Gomez v. CAMPBELL-EWALD CO.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Kensington Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Jackson Therapy Partners, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Wilder Chiropractic, Inc. v. Pizza Hut of Southern Wisconsin, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- Johnson v. Midwest ATM, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.