Legal Opinion

Cambrian Science Corp. v. Cox Communications, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided January 6, 2015No. Case No. SACV 11-01011 AG (JPRx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, DKT. NO. 379; GRANTING DEFENDANT COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, DKT. NO. 377.

ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This case involves motions for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 in a difficult case. Defendants Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”); XO Communications Services, LLC; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.; Level 3 Communications LLC; 360networks (USA), Inc.; Electric Lightwave, LLC, dba Integra Telecom; IXC Holdings, Inc, dba Telekenex (collectively, “Customer…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arcona, Inc. v. Farmacy Beauty, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  2. Champion Power Equipment Incorporated v. Firman Power Equipment IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  3. Extremity Medical, LLC v. Nextremity Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
  4. Y.Y.G.M. SA v. Redbubble, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API