Cambrian Science Corp. v. Cox Communications, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, DKT. NO. 379; GRANTING DEFENDANT COX COMMUNICATIONS, INC.’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, DKT. NO. 377.
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This case involves motions for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 in a difficult case. Defendants Cox Communications, Inc. (“Cox”); XO Communications Services, LLC; Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc.; Level 3 Communications LLC; 360networks (USA), Inc.; Electric Lightwave, LLC, dba Integra Telecom; IXC Holdings, Inc, dba Telekenex (collectively, “Customer…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arcona, Inc. v. Farmacy Beauty, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Champion Power Equipment Incorporated v. Firman Power Equipment IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Extremity Medical, LLC v. Nextremity Solutions, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Y.Y.G.M. SA v. Redbubble, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2021