Legal Opinion

Farmers' Union Mercantile Co. v. Anderson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 5, 1917No. 9802PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Before Gary, J., Barnwell, March, 1917. Action by the Farmers Union Mercantile Company against F. H. Anderson. From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to defendant’s counterclaim, he appeals. cites: As'to counterclaim: 11 S. C. 337; 2 Bay 351; 10 Rich. 318; Pomeroy Rem., sec. 798, p. 817. cite: 57 S. C 500.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

Plaintiff sued on a note. Defendant set up a counterclaim, immaterial verbage omitted, as follows:

“That the above named plaintiff, together with the Home Bank of Barnwell, some time during the fall of 1914, organized an institution known as the ‘Farmers 'Union Warehouse,’ and induced the defendant to store therein eleven bales of lint cotton.
“That when defendant stored said cotton, the plaintiff contracted and agreed to hold said cotton for such time as the defendant would be able to obtain a fair price, and to insure said cotton,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. V. P. Randolph & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Tindall v. McCarthySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bramlett v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Garden City Floral Co. v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Maryland Casualty Co. v. DelzerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Timmons v. Williams Wood Products Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  5. Speizman v. GuillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API