Speizman v. Guill
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Circuit Judge Wm. H. Grimbaee, Acting Associate Justice,
delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court:
This action was commenced by plaintiff against defendant to assert certain rights claimed by plaintiff concerning a balance of purchase-nioney alleged to be secured by certain laundry and cleaning machinery and equipment, sold by plaintiff to defendant under a conditional sale or' title-retention contract. Whether those rights, as set forth in the complaint, constitute a legal or an equitable cause of action is the question. The defendant answered admitting certain allegations of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- V. P. Randolph & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Mortgage Loan Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
- Farmers' Union Mercantile Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Soulios v. Mills Novelty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bramlett v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
- Castell v. Stephenson Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Mishoe v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- United States v. Clover Spinning Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- Johnson Cotton Co. v. CannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.