Legal Opinion

Hazel v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 25, 1961No. [No. 22, September Term, 1961 (Adv.)]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

Hazel, the appellant, was tried on a charge of rape by the Criminal Court of Baltimore, three judges sitting without a jury. He was found sane and guilty as charged, and sentenced to death. In the appeal to this Court sanity was not an issue, the sole question argued and decided being the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt. The judgment was affirmed in Hazel v. State, 221 Md. 464.

After the affirmance, and within weeks of the day Hazel was to have been executed, the court-appointed lawyers who had represented him at his trial filed on his behalf a petition for relief…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Alcorta v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States Ex Rel. Almeida v. BaldiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  4. Hazel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  5. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tull v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. State v. TullCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Sangster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. State v. EwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Lomax v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API