Legal Opinion
Matter of Dandridge
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 13, 1975No. 47PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JONES, Chief Justice.
The Judicial Inquiry and Review Board instituted formal proceedings against Judge Paul A. Dandridge by written notice served on June 3, 1974, charging the Judge as follows:
“It is charged that PAUL A. DANDRIDGE, Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, has violated the Constitution of Pennsylvania, Article V, Section 17 (b), as follows:
‘Justices and judges shall not engage in any activity prohibited by law and shall not violate any canon of legal or judicial ethics prescribed by the Supreme Court. .' . . ’
IN THAT PAUL A. DANDRIDGE, on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bell v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Commonwealth of Penna. v. BeattieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Commonwealth v. GrossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Scranton City v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Matter of CunninghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. Derhammer, J., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Matter of ChioveroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Matter of DalessandroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.