Legal Opinion
McGinnity v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 18, 1998No. Nos. 3:96 CV 1147(JGM), 3:96 CV 1148(JGM) and 3:96 CV 1146(JGM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING SPOLIATION
MARGOLIS, United States Magistrate Judge.
On June 23, 1998, plaintiffs filed the pending Motion In Limine Regarding Spoliation and brief in support. (Dkt. ## 26-27).1 On July 15, 1998, defendant filed its brief in opposition. (Dkt. ##28-29).2 On August 10, 1998, plaintiffs filed their reply brief. (Dkt.# 33) .3
/. DISCUSSION
Plaintiffs Whalen, Mingione, and McGinnity were employed by defendant Metro-North as a locomotive engineer, conductor, and assistant conductor, respectively. Early in the morning of May 5, 1996, the train in which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kronisch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Turner v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Allstate Insurance Company, as Subrogee of Benito Garcia and Eutimia Garcia v. Sunbeam CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Shaffer v. RWP Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Hester Industries, Inc. v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1997
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mathias v. JacobsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000