Legal Opinion
Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Mendez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 21, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance Company is not obligated to defend or indemnify the defendants Pedro Mendez and Angela Mendez in an underlying action commenced by the defendant Jeanette Vargas, Interboro Mutual Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), dated December 4, 1997, as denied that branch of its motion which was, in effect, for summary judgment on the complaint.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting therefrom the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Deso v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Allstate Insurance v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. WorthyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- State Farm Insurance v. ArcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. FatsisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001