Legal Opinion

Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Fatsis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 8, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendants John Fatsis and William Fatsis in an underlying action entitled Condon v Fatsis, pending in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 97-025162, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated September 30, 1999, as granted that branch of the motion of the Fatsis defendants which was for partial summary judgment on the issue of whether the plaintiff is obligated to defend them in the underlying…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Winstead v. Uniondale Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Sphere Drake Insurance v. Block 7206 Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Zadrima v. PSM Insurance CompaniesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Mattress Discounters of New York, Inc. v. United States Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kahn v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Nabutovsky v. Burlington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API