Legal Opinion

People v. Anonymous

New York City Magistrates' Court

Decided December 23, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Budich, C. M.

The defendant, a male person, is charged with vagrancy under clause (f) of subdivision 4 of section 887 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The proof clearly establishes the fact that on December 3, 1936, the defendant committed an act of sexual intercourse with a prostitute, for which he paid her the sum of one dollar. Both were arrested in the house where the act was committed. Before the trial of this defendant the woman was arraigned in Women’s Court, and she there pleaded guilty to the charge. The defendant here did not take the stand to deny the testimony against him, but he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. People v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. People v. RiceIllinois Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SeverinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. McNeil v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. People v. LinkCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1981
  4. McNeil v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API