In re the Estate of Grotsky
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
John D. Bennett, S.
In this discovery proceeding respondent moves to vacate the petitioner’s demand for a bill of particulars on the grounds that the demand is repetitious, burdensome, and seeks evidentiary matter.
The respondent has interposed an affirmative defense to paragraph 4 of the petition, alleging that the stock sought to be recovered by the petitioner was the subject of a gift to her.
Bills of particulars are regularly required in a discovery proceeding (Matter of Leary, 175 Misc. 253). Although no particulars may be demanded during the inquisitorial stage, where there is an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Estate of KevillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of BrittonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of KusterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In re the Estate of LearyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- Adams v. CoeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re the Estate of EnglishNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960