Walrus Mfg. Co. v. McMehen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Brror from Superior Court, Pittsburg County;' P. D. Brewer, Judge. Action by the Walrus Manufacturing Company against C. A. McMehen. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THACKER, C.
The position of the parties, in respect to their descriptive titles, remains the same here as in the trial court. Plaintiff sold the Nix Pharmacy and installed in its place of business at McAlester, Okla., a soda fountain, with articles for use in connection therewith, including a pat ented carbonatar, for $1,100, of which $200 was paid at the time; the balance of $900 being evidenced by the purchaser’s notes secured by his chattel mortgage on all the property. And about two and one-half months later defendant purchased with the consent of plaintiff, if not from it, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. HolidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Nelson v. Armour Packing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- G. M. C. Truck Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Standard Sewing MacH. Co. v. New State Shirt & Overall Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co., Inc. v. Foust Distilling CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Hunter-Wilson Distilling Co. v. Foust Distilling Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Sherman v. Sheffield Cast Iron Foundry CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.