Legal Opinion

Grimsley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 16, 2007No. 2D07-1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

967 So.2d 1132 (2007)

Michael GRIMSLEY, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 2D07-1948.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 16, 2007.

Michael Grimsley, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard M. Fishkin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

CANADY, Judge.

Michael Grimsley, in his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), alleges that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue in the direct appeal of his aggravated battery conviction that the instruction on the justifiable use of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zuniga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. York v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Grimsley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Houston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Brewer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Wolfork v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  4. Grimsley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Riley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API