Legal Opinion
Wolfork v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 24, 2008No. 2D08-632PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
992 So.2d 907 (2008)
Ray A. WOLFORK, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 2D08-632.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
October 24, 2008.
Ray A. Wolfork, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard M. Fishkin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.
DAVIS, Judge.
Ray A. Wolfork, in his petition filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c), contends that appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that the aggravated battery instruction that was given to the jury at trial constituted fundamental error. We agree,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Battle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- C.A.C. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Garcia v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Grimsley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Mathis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- STEVEN CANNON v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- Thames v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Thames v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.