Legal Opinion
Hazelhurst v. Brita Products Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 25, 2002PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered October 30, 2001, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for class cer*241tification, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, the motion denied and the class decertified.
Defendants, The Brita Products Company and The Clorox Company (hereinafter Brita), manufacture and sell a home water filtration system, which consists of a pitcher, a reservoir and a filter. The user of the Brita filtration system pours tap water into the reservoir which gradually passes through the filter into the pitcher. From July 8, 1992 to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Small v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by19 opinions
- Solomon v. Bell Atlantic Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gale v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Newman v. RCN Telecom Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Canario v. GunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Klein v. Robert's American Gourmet Food, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.