Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Kelly

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 23, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

Yiewing tbe evidence in its most favorable light for tbe defeated parties, tbe established rule on a directed verdict (In re Will of Deyton, 177 N. C., 494, 90 S. E., 424), we are of opinion that it is sufficient to carry tbe case to tbe jury on tbe issue of due attestation.

It is true, tbe decisions are to tbe effect that tbe subscribing witnesses to a will, in some responsible way, should be requested to witness its execution. In re Herring’s Will, 152 N. C., 258, 67 S. E., 570. This may be impliéd from tbe circumstances and tbe conduct of tbe testator. Burney v. Allen, 125 N.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peck v. . CaryNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Lee v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Burney v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Graham v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1849
  5. Allison v. AllisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Will of ReddingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. In Re the Will of FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. In Re the Will of McCauleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. In Re Will of EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Brickhouse v. BrickhouseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API