Owensby v. Riegel Textile Corp.

Bell, Judge.

The claimant’s first objections relate to the findings of fact that the defendant had made available to the claimant light work suitable toi his impaired condition; that the claimant had knowledge that this- work was available to him; that the light work suitable to his impaired condition was available to him as of September 15, 1960 ; and that the claimant’s disability ended on that date. He contends that these findings were mere conjecture; that the phrase, “available light work suitable to claimant’s impaired condition,” has no definite meaning; that there is no evidence in the…