Legal Opinion

Smith v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 27, 1947No. 31614PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

1. (a) It is conceded that the deceased was a trespasser. It must be conceded also that he was a mature man, in the possession of all his faculties and senses. The gist of the contentions of the plaintiff is that the engineer in moving “one or two box cars” northward on the main track of the railway company, had coupled the front of the switch engine to the rear of one of the cars, which cars were being pushed toward the packing plant. Thus it was that the engineer obstructed his vision along the "track to such an extent that he could not see one on the track and that in so doing the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Atlanta & Charlotte Air-Line Rwy. Co. v. GravittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  2. Mandeville Mills v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. ChatmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API