Legal Opinion

People v. Kanouse

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 3, 1984No. Docket 68278PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.

Defendant appeals as of right his jury conviction of driving under the influence of liquor (DUIL), third offense, MCL 257.625; MSA 9.2325, and of resisting arrest, MCL 750.479; MSA 28.747. Defendant’s trial was comprised of two phases, with the jury first determining that defendant was guilty of the charged offenses of DUIL and resisting arrest, and secondly determining that this was defendant’s third DUIL offense in the past ten years. See People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817, 820; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). With respect to the first phase, defendant claims that the court erred in denying defense…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. People v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. ProvienceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matheson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. StrattonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. KanouseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API