Legal Opinion

At & T CORP. v. Chumley

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 21, 2005No. M2004-01514-COA-R3-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · CainWilliam B. Cain, J.

in which WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., P.J., M.S., and FRANK G. CLEMENT, J., joined.

AT & T sued the Commissioner of Revenue of Tennessee to recover sales tax paid on central office equipment for the years 1995 and 1996 asserting that the equipment qualifies for exemption as industrial machinery. Determining that the outcome of the case was controlled by AT & T v. Johnson, 2002 WL 31247083 (Tenn.Ct.App.2002), the Chancellor held that the industrial machinery exemption was not applicable. We affirm the judgment of the Chancellor.

Since we are reviewing the action of the trial court in a Tennessee…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. GuentherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  2. Holloway v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Assessors of Springfield v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API